|
Superior Performance
Indicator |
Sufficient Performance
Indicator |
Limited Performance
Indicator |
Minimum Performance
Indicator |
| Research of Biographical
Information |
Collected all information needed
to apply biographical data to the reading selection plus
accurately and clearly to the timeline. |
Collected most of information
needed and information meets most but not all needs in
application to the reading selection or for creation of
timeline. |
Collected some information but
information is unclear in application to the reading selection
or for creation of timeline. |
Did not collect information needed
for apply biography to reading selection or for creation of
timeline. |
| Creation of program/ playbill
including biography, acts/scenes/timeline, cast, cover with
illustration. |
Product reflects collection of all
data needed and is well organized both in information and
graphic appeal. |
Product reflects collection of
most data needed and is organized but lacks either clarity or
graphic appeal. |
Product reflects collection of
most data needed and is organized but lacks clarity and
graphic appeal. |
Product does not reflect
collection of data needed and is not organized, lacks clarity
and graphic appeal. |
| Group presentation convinces the
audience to include the selection in the upcoming theatre
presentation of Poe. |
Uses original approach effectively
and is highly organized. Well rehearsed showing ease in
delivery and adequate preparation. |
Uses original approach effectively
and is highly organized but shows lack of rehearsal with
inadequate delivery and preparation. |
Approach is less than effective
and shows little organization. Some evidence of rehearshal but
lacks delivery. |
Approach is not effective and
shows minimum organization. Little evidence of rehearshal and
lacks delivery. |
| Selection of presentation
media/mode suited the reading selection and team made good use
of the medium/mode of presentation. |
Presentation medium/mode was
effective and student use showed expertise. |
Presentation medium/mode was
effective and student use showed lack of expertise. |
Presentation medium/mode was not
best choice for selection and was not as effective as other
mediums. Student use showed lack of expertise. |
Presentation medium/mode was not
effective. Student use showed lack of expertise. |
| Individual student worked
cooperatively with teammates and participated in elements of
the project |
Student worked well with partner
and group. Student input was accurate and timely. Student
participated in all aspects of the project. |
Student worked well with partner
and group. Student input was accurate and timely. Student did
not participate in all aspects of the project. |
Student did not work well with
partner and/or group. Student input was accurate and timely.
Student did not participate in all aspects of the
project. |
Student did not work well with
partner and/or group. Student input was not always accurate
and/or timely. Student did not participate in all aspects of
the project. |
| Project overall was professional
in both print and nonprint components. |
Project included all components
and was presented to the class in a timely professional
manner. |
Project included all components
and was presented to the class but lacked professional
qualities needed to be considered superior. |
Project included most all
components and was presented to the class but lacked
professional qualities needed to be considered
sufficient. |
Project did not include most all
components and was presented to the class but lacked
professional qualities needed to be considered sufficient or
limited. |
